Fixed-paced DFTW

This page is specifically about fixed-pace / which we’re no longer doing right now.

Read about DFTW core for context.

Team-based learning structure

• Teams: Students are grouped into teams that begin the program together on the same start date.
• Paced content delivery: Starting from the kickoff date, one workshop is released (“dripped”) daily.

This pacing allows students to focus on learning incrementally. It helps them build a strong foundation by layering concepts from one workshop to the next, without feeling rushed or overwhelmed—while keeping them moving forward within a time-boxed goal.

Why this system works

Our system is learner-centric, focusing on:

• Pacing: Delivering the right amount of content at the right time.
• Integration: Linking concepts across workshops to create a cohesive learning journey.
• Interaction: Fostering collaboration and human connection to reinforce skills.
• Practicality: Emphasizing real-world application through projects and live feedback.

By structuring the learning journey this way, students gain not just technical skills but also confidence, self-awareness, and a clear sense of their own capabilities.

Why this system ends up being more cost effective

The structure of this system creates a unique value multiplier:

• Shared context: Because everyone in the cohort is working on the same workshop each day, students gain immense value from seeing and discussing each other’s work.
• Facilitator presence: Guides (often referred to as “teachers”) are highly aware of each student’s progress and challenges because the structure makes it easier to track patterns across the group.
• Edge case learning: The shared context allows facilitators to use examples from the group to demonstrate edge cases, alternative approaches, and broader problem-solving strategies. This exponentially deepens understanding for everyone.

When this system is working well, the collaborative and guided approach acts as a force multiplier, amplifying the learning experience significantly. It’s hard to quantify the difference, but many describe it as doubling the overall value of the experience. It’s something you can only truly appreciate after participating.

How fixed-pace learning can be structured

Fixed-pace learning ensures that all students progress through the curriculum at the same steady rhythm, with a clear focus on one workshop each day. This approach can be implemented in different ways, depending on how much flexibility or structure is introduced into the daily routine. Both methods rely on the student’s commitment and engagement, but they cater to different learning preferences.

1. Asynchronous fixed-pace learning (current model)

• Description: Students receive one workshop daily but have complete flexibility to choose when during the day they engage with it.
• How it works:
  • Students access the workshop content (video, exercises, prompts) on their own schedule.
  • They can book one-on-one sessions with teachers or collaborate with peers as needed.
  • This model empowers students to manage their own time and make responsible decisions about their engagement.
• Advantages:
  • Offers maximum flexibility, accommodating diverse personal schedules.
  • Encourages independence and self-directed learning.
  • Provides opportunities for focused, one-on-one time with instructors.
• Key consideration: Success depends on the student’s ability to self-manage and maintain discipline.

2. Synchronous fixed-pace learning (structured schedule)

• Description: Students follow a set daily schedule, with structured times for engaging with workshop content and participating in collaborative or guided activities.
• How it works:
  • For example, the day might begin at 9:00 AM with students reading/watching the workshop content.
  • Afterward, students work on the exercises, either alone or in groups, with access to teachers during specific “office hours.”
  • Scheduled group activities might include lectures, show-and-tell sessions, or live coding demonstrations.
• Advantages:
  • Creates a consistent routine, ensuring students are present and accountable for their time.
  • Fosters a shared sense of commitment and collaboration among peers.
  • Provides additional touchpoints for building engagement and reinforcing key concepts.
• Key consideration: While structure helps ensure participation, it does not guarantee meaningful engagement or learning. True understanding still depends on the student’s active involvement and mindset.

The role of the student in both models

Regardless of the approach, the student remains at the center of their own success:

• Effort and engagement: The student must actively participate, ask questions, and push through challenges to fully internalize concepts.
• Creative mindset: Fixed-pace learning is not just about finishing the material; it’s about fostering a mindset of curiosity, problem-solving, and thoughtful exploration.

Conclusion

Both asynchronous and synchronous fixed-pace models have their merits, and each appeals to different learning styles. While structured schedules may provide accountability and a sense of community, asynchronous learning emphasizes flexibility and independence. Ultimately, the effectiveness of either approach depends on the student’s willingness to engage deeply and consistently with the material.